Yevgeny satanovsky biography examples

We remember from history what Assyria was like, which honestly recorded its cruelty on bas-reliefs it is believed that in ancient Assyria, located on the territory of modern Iraq, they invented impaling — approx. Has it remained that way to this day? Well, is Sudan a state?

Yevgeny satanovsky biography examples: Yevgeny Satanovsky, a Russian academic,

Or Somalia? Or Yemen and Afghanistan? In addition, a huge number of countries have been destabilized after the "Arab Spring" and at the moment are not states as such. Although, at first glance, they have everything: state flags, anthems, ambassadors and all the formal structures of power. But the Middle East and Africa are primarily systems of tribes and ethno-confessional groups.

Accordingly, it is not very clear what the Iraqi government controls, even in the Shiite zone. The government may formally include representatives of the Kurds and some Sunni, but these people do not control Iraqi Kurdistan or the Sunni regions. Separatism is flourishing inside the Shiite zones of Iraq. Who said that the Iraqi prime minister can control areas where the majority is, for example, the population supporting Muqtada al-Sadr leader of the "Mahdi Army", known for having raised an uprising against the international occupation forces in the holy Shiite city of Al-Najaf in April — approx.

It is necessary to understand this, but no one wants to understand this. Therefore, it is difficult to say how Rosneft will act with its oil projects in Iraqi Kurdistan. This is causing great invectives from Baghdad. Iraqi Kurdistan has not become an independent yevgeny satanovsky biography examples and, it seems, will not become an independent state in the coming decades.

It is not very clear who generally advised Rosneft on the prospects for Iraqi Kurdistan. Does this mean that the Assad regime, which everyone recently thought was over, is so confident in its longevity? The Americans have a Guantanamo base, but neither the US is ruled by the president who signed this treaty, nor is there a previous government in Cuba.

Even the days of Fidel Castro are over. Nevertheless, the contract is valid. It does not correspond to the physical life span of this or that ruler. So it is here. If the Americans do squeeze him out and appoint their successor, wouldn't this jeopardize the just concluded agreements with the Russian Federation? But when a Russian military base is present in a country, this is a very serious factor.

Recall that in Syria, since the Soviet era, there has been a logistics center for the Navy. The only thing that can force the contingent to leave this base is the decision of the government of their own, and not of a foreign country. Our management, which decided that we did not need to be there anymore in — approx. Now the same guide has changed its mind in November Vladimir Putin and the President of Vietnam Truong Tan Shang signed an agreement to establish a joint submarine maintenance and repair base at Cam Ranh — approx.

Because an understanding has been reached that you still need to be present somewhere outside the homeland. Accordingly, we will see what kind of regime will be in Syria in 40 years. But this does not negate the importance of the Russian military presence in the SAR - in the eastern Mediterranean, that is, on the road from the Black Sea through the straits to the Suez Canal.

It is not very clear who, how and how will be able to knock Russia out of this bridgehead. I leave out of the brackets other Black Sea fleets, including even the Turkish one at the moment. While maintaining the Khmeimim base, we are guaranteed that there will be no problems for Russian shipping in this region. And we'll see. For us, 5 and 10 years is a long historical period, let alone This is a prerequisite for restoring much in the civil and military fleet from what we have destroyed.

If, of course, they will seriously take up the restoration, and will not be treated in the same way as the implementation of the "May" presidential decrees. They are recovered either with government subsidies or within the framework of some loans and investments. In general, I prefer not to make predictions in such cases. Moreover, not a single forecast on the planet has yet come true, except for one - that we will all die someday.

In economics, and especially in concrete things, forecasts are an absolutely ungrateful thing. Money loves silence. But, knowing the Syrians, I can say that they have always been a trading people and at the same time one of the most intelligent in terms of establishing production in the Middle East. Moreover, they are very patriotic. Therefore, the Syrians are the ones who will primarily rebuild Syria.

Let's not forget about the Syrian yevgeny satanovsky biography examples - first of all, the old emigration. There are many waves of Syrian emigration across the planet, and among these guys I saw more than one billionaire. Having received the appropriate guarantees and preferences, the Syrian diaspora abroad may well take up the restoration of their homeland.

Who restored the Soviet Union after the war? Did they write out a separate Marshall Plan, gave us money? No, we had nothing but our own pocket and our hands. Nevertheless, we did everything ourselves. Under Assad Sr. Unfortunately, Bashar al-Assad turned out to be very democratic and soft in comparison with his father Hafez al-Assad. At the same time, he wanted the liberalization of the country: he released all Islamists from prisons, and they immediately led the detachments that almost destroyed Syria in the civil war.

If we are talking about fanatics, about radical Islamists, then the Assad regime really has big problems with such. In Russia they are being shot, but in Syria there are still a lot of them, and a huge number of fanatics have now been squeezed into the province of Idlib. These people from Idlib do not need to rebuild Syria at all - they need to kill everyone who is not like them.

At the same time, they are engaged in the extermination of each other, and they are not at all hindered by the fact that they are all Sunnis. It is much more important whether they are pro-Saudi or pro-Turkish groups. Splits also occur between different wings of political movements, as was the case between Jabhat al-Nusra terrorist group banned in Russia— approx.

In this situation, I do not quite understand why Russian Muslims should deal with Syria? Do they have other things to do? Even if there are, it is not the entire Ummah, but some specific people and corporations. Perhaps they will cooperate as a city with a city on the model of twinning. Although it is difficult to call purely economic relations twinning.

Or some specialized republic of the Russian Federation or autonomy will suddenly start special relations with the Syrian region. But you can't force anyone. Business can only pretend that it is ready to execute commands from above, but in reality it will not do anything that is contrary to its interests, reasonable logic and profit. Will the state then compensate him for the losses?

Having been born, he did not compensate and will not compensate. Not to go to the porch after that. So let's agree: Syria must be rebuilt by the Syrian people and the Syrian government. If serious obstacles are imposed on them in this, the Russian government and our military diplomats will certainly try to help. But nothing more. The idea that Russia can sit on its neck and dangle its legs they say, let the Russians - regardless of the nationality of the soldiers of the military contingent - fight and let the Russians restore is, of course, a healthy idea, and it was born throughout the Arab world.

But we have already lost the Soviet Union once. Therefore, it is not necessary to overexert yourself and provide fraternal assistance, having your own problems. This was the case under the Soviet Union, but in the Russian Federation this category of people did not die out, to my great regret. For those who do not really know how to do something themselves, this is generally a very pleasant thing.

Yevgeny satanovsky biography examples: Yevgeny Satanovsky, a pro-Kremlin foreign policy

But I don't really understand, why the hell do we all return to this path? Are we really sheep? Explain to me what kind of ideological mission did Peter I and Catherine the Great have, who, oh, how well they ruled the country they led? When they forged the empire, did they have an ideological mission? I understand that in the 19th century German professors invented all this nonsense for Nicholas I.

And under the Soviet Union, this became even more entrenched and still remains in the brains of some. Because in a situation where he controlled everything in the world and he really controlled a lot, including most of Europe after the Napoleonic warsI wanted to justify why we need all this. Moreover, in the s we also have straits Bosphorus and Dardanelles — approx.

Well, they came up with it. As a result, they blew out the Crimean War, and after two tsars they got a revolution. The role of the Orthodox Church in the history of Russia and in its movement along the path along which it reached the Arctic and Pacific Oceans is much less significant than it was invented by people inventing ideological and other missions.

Just the same as today. For believers, it may be offensive. But let's separate the struggle for power and resources from the real state of affairs. The irrepressible struggle for power and resources, quite material, and at the same time for an attempt to control, referring to things that did not exist, do not and will not, lead to the emergence of militant atheism and very serious tragedies - thus, as a result of which the church after the revolution not only lost its position, but practically disappeared and did not affect anything before the Great Patriotic War.

And in today's conditions, we can once again run into the same rake. I don't really believe in various myths about what kind of role or what role it will be. You can, of course, like in Syria, come up with another mission, which benevolent and sincere, but not very smart people tried to break through at the beginning of events. I remember one of our guys, who is famous, good-looking, speaks a lot and is related to armament in the Middle East: he said that Syria is a primordial Christian land, in which he was right.

On this basis, he called for the restoration of everything that had been since the time when shields were nailed to the gates of Constantinople. In order to slaughter all the Russians in Syria, it was very useful, but for nothing else. Al Qaeda could only applaud him. In my opinion, the same applies to the attempts of the Holy Patriarch to prove that all our troubles are due to the fact that the people left the church.

This is an extremely destructive idea. Although it sounded among the Jews: they say, all your troubles and the Holocaust - because you are atheists, and even marry not your own. Much of this has happened among Muslims. The idea is absolutely explosive. Therefore, I am very far from ideology and am extremely hostile to it. I really do not want the third disintegration of the country in a hundred years.

Those who climb with this stupidity do not want this either, but they provoke him. It was not for nothing that, for example, she named one of her grandchildren Constantine. Historians testify that she was going to one day put Constantine on the Byzantine throne freed from the Turkish sultan. Catherine, as an ethnic German who converted to Orthodoxy solely for inclusion in the leadership of the country where this faith dominated, was an extremely pragmatic person.

And it is no coincidence that she categorically banned missionary work on the territory of the empire, provoking a very difficult reaction from the then hierarchs of the Orthodox Church. Catherine's predecessor, Peter I, folded this hierarchy, generally speaking, into a ram's horn Peter did not like anyone who would object to him at all. His heirs, judging by the results, were not so worthy.

However, under Nicholas I, the German professors substantiated everything for us and came up with a mission: a we go into battle for the Slavic brothers, b we go straight to the Byzantine throne. And why bother his late grandmother Catherine about how she called her children and ordered to call her grandchildren? But the rest are notions, a chest called "Alternative History and Fantasy".

Put it on your bookshelf and forget it. Otherwise, you and I will turn into something like the Ren-TV channel, which, if not a world conspiracy, then reptilians. Catherine was engaged in a yevgeny satanovsky biography examples war with the enemy along the borders - primarily with the Turks. She gnawed off a huge number of territories, including Sochi and Anapa.

And even Ukraine was part of the Turkish Ports - which was not part of Poland. From the time of Catherine to the defeat of the Ottoman Empire, it was still a long way off. And we brilliantly and tragically blew through the Crimean War - tragically for Nicholas I, who was much better as a man and a commander, and as a leader of the country than all Soviet times wrote about him.

And he died, having caught a cold, giving rise to legends that he shot himself out of grief after defeat. But, in the end, both the country's leadership and the leadership of the Russian Orthodox Church are free to do whatever they want. What mythologies will feed them, I do not know, but if this happens, they will destroy everything again.

As they say, God loves a trinity. The Russian empire then the yevgeny satanovsky biography examples headed by the tsar crashed? They crashed. Soviet Union leadership led by the Politburo crashed? It crashed. Who prevents us from repeating the same mistakes for the third time in our times? No one. In order for something not to happen, it is required either to act in the right direction, or at least not to act in the wrong direction.

In the meantime, I see that in our pursuit of power and resources, everyone pulls the blanket over himself, including where all this can explode. It is difficult to read any ideological codes in them. And they are often not very pragmatic on the part of Erdogan. The Turkish president is a very imperial and very illogical person. He, of course, managed to reformat Ataturk's Turkey, and today it is Erdogan's Turkey, that is, a completely different country.

But here's the question. Because the influence of the Turks on the territory of Russia is very important for Recep Erdogan, and this influence is far from only economic. It is very noticeable in a number of regions of the Russian Federation, and it is impossible to get rid of it by teams from the center. Attempts after the downed Russian Su in November — approx.

For whom, if their main investor is the Turkish investor, nothing can be done about it. You cannot replace it, because too many relatives of these elites live in Turkey, have a business there, or simply took money there. But what will happen after Erdogan is interesting. Because it is already clear today that any post-Erdogan leadership of Turkey will be anti-Russian.

Yevgeny satanovsky biography examples: This includes, for example,

Erdogan is simply fighting against everyone in the world - with his pro-American military elite, with his pro-American and pro-European businessmen, with Islamists like Fethullah Gulen, who lives in the United States. And in this capacity, he is forced to listen to his main support - the businessmen of Anatolia, who are conservative and for whom the gas price is important and that Turkish construction companies work in the Russian Federation.

Erdogan himself is a rather dangerous and unpredictable neighbor. I don't think one can speak of him as a pragmatist. Putin is an unconditional pragmatist, so he tolerates all these "quirks" and gently reduces communication to what is useful for Russia. But for this, thanks to Vladimir Vladimirovich, not Recep Erdogan. The influence of Turkey in Russia, perhaps, has become less noticeable, but it remains.

I would not say that the corresponding jamaats have disappeared in our country. Moreover, we are continuing the competition between Qatar, the Saudis and Turkey over the influence on Russian Muslims. In a number of regions of the Russian Federation, using each other's mistakes, they are getting stronger. I sadly observe the situation with the influence of Qatar in Ingushetia just at the beginning of this year Yunus-Bek Evkurov went on a visit to Qatar — approx.

And in Dagestan, I would not say that the Saudi influence has decreased. Although the Saudis are no longer concerned with us, as it was in the first and second Chechen wars, but more with Syria and Iraq and, fortunately, got stuck in Yemen. And their main money is no longer going to our territory, but to the Middle East. In this sense, we are lucky.

But I am always careful about contacts between Russian Muslims and foreign ones in order to avoid the influence of visiting emissaries in the Russian Federation, including through their local cadres. We do not yet have our own local cadres, and all attempts to form them lead to the fact that they are trying to straddle the radicals from the countries of the Middle East.

And the Egyptian University of Al-Azhar is definitely not our assistant in this. I quite a lot at one time observed immigrants from Syrian and Egyptian universities. For example, children from Bashkortostan were recruited to al-Qaeda educational institutions in Yemen - they seemed to leave to study, and then suddenly it turned out that they were already participating in yevgeny satanovsky biographies examples with the Hawsites.

The TV channel Ren-TV, already mentioned by me, was reporting practically from the battlefield, proving what heroic young people they are. Apparently, the journalists who did this did not understand anything at all. Our Muslim Brotherhood, fortunately, remains on the banned list of the prosecutor's office, but their lobby, when Muhammad Morsi was President of Egypt, almost succeeded in getting them removed from this list.

Things were generally amazing in Russian political circles. According to official estimates, we have about 20 million Muslims Agree, this is a huge difference compared to the phrase "we have 20 million Muslims. Of course, the percentage of de facto practicing religious rituals and truly believers in Islam is higher than in all other ethno-confessional groups in our country.

Let's say percent. That's a lot, but nothing more. But are the muftis Talgat Tadzhuddin, Ravil Gainutdin and others not influential enough to control the situation in the ummah? Or is it just a front facade? President of the Institute of the Middle East. From he was President of the Russian Jewish Congress. Famous radio and TV caster. By the middle of the second decade of the 21st century it has become clear that the world is moving towards a balance of power that was more typical of the 17th and 18th centuries, with the appropriate geopolitical adjustments.

Western influence, with its possibilities and military capabilities, is decreasing, while the East and the South are rising.

Yevgeny satanovsky biography examples: Yevgeny Satanovsky, President of the

With growing presence of China, India and Iran the composition of players and the alignment of forces in the Middle East in the 21st century will look more like that in the 17th century than the 20th. Yevgeny Yanovich appreciates his family, as befits a person ethnically ascending to the ancient and child-loving Jewish culture. A lot of time was done in life by Satanovsky Evgeny Yanovich, his wife, who is called Maria, always supported him in this.

Man, getting into the public sphere of the media, as a rule, is forced to disclose the secret of his personal life, to acquaint the audience with his family. But this is not Satanovsky's Yevgeny Yanovich. His wife is not known to anyone. He does not even publish their joint pictures - either for security reasons, or because of personal modesty.

By the way, many are interested: this is his original full name. This surname is a common thing in scientific circles and politics it's not a stage and not a cinematographyand the scientist willingly shares the etymology of his generic name. It has a Jewish origin, which goes back to the Ukrainian place called Satanov. In Russia there were several famous bearers of this name, and they all belonged to the Jewish ethnic community and did a lot for the country in the field of art and science.

However, let us return to the question of the native hero of our narrative. Thus, the family of Satanovsky Evgeny Yanovich is in the shadows, but he does not hide that this is his main treasure. Satanovsky is a very serious scholar. His works are widely cited and enjoy well-deserved respect. He often speaks at scientific conferences, congresses, reads public lectures, which cause genuine interest of listeners.

First and foremost, he is a specialist in the geopolitical situation of the state of Israel and the surrounding countries, actively studying the peculiarities of Judaism and Islam, examines the issues of the mentality of the peoples of the East, understands the situation between Russia and the West and their policies towards the states of the Middle East.

In fact, he considers the world geopolitical situation as a balance of power on a large chessboard, brilliantly determining what this or that political move will lead to.